翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ New York Surrogate's Court ・ New York Symphony Orchestra ・ New York Tattoo Museum ・ New York Television Festival ・ New York Television Theatre ・ New York Tendaberry ・ New York Theatre ・ New York Theatre Ballet ・ New York Theatre Workshop ・ New York Theatrical Syndicate ・ New York Theological Seminary ・ New York Thrash ・ New York Times Building (41 Park Row) ・ New York Times Building (disambiguation) ・ New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ・ New York Times Co. v. Tasini ・ New York Times Co. v. United States ・ New York Times College Scholarship Program ・ New York Times controversies ・ New York Times Index ・ New York Times Youth Forum ・ New York Titans ・ New York Titans (lacrosse) ・ New York Town ・ New York Township, Caldwell County, Missouri ・ New York TRACON ・ New York Training School for Girls ・ New York Transit Museum ・ New York Transportation Company ・ New York Tribune Building Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク New York Times Co. v. Tasini ： ウィキペディア英語版 New York Times Co. v. Tasini ''New York Times Co. v. Tasini'', 533 U.S. 483 (2001), is a leading decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of copyright in the contents of a newspaper database. It held that ''The New York Times'', in licensing back issues of the newspaper for inclusion in electronic databases such as LexisNexis, could not license the works of free-lance journalists contained in the newspapers. The lawsuit brought by members of the UAW's National Writers Union against the New York Times Company, Newsday Inc., Time Inc., University Microfilms International, and LexisNexis. The freelance writers charged copyright infringement due to the use and reuse in electronic media of articles initially licensed to be published in print form. In a 7-2 ruling delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court affirmed the copyright privileges of freelance writers whose works were originally published in periodicals and then provided by the publishers to electronic databases without explicit permission of, or compensation to, the writers. As a result of the decision, plaintiffs won a compensation pool of $18 million. ==History== The case was initially heard in the district court of Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who held that the publishers were within their rights according to the Copyright Act of 1976. This decision was reversed on appeal, and the Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court's reversal.〔(Sotomayor's resume, record on notable cases ), ''CNN.com'', 26 May 2009. Accessed 26 May 2009.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「New York Times Co. v. Tasini」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.